Nuns....Down Low Hoes? Victims? Pedophiles? All The Above.

Much like police officers, corrupt clergy outweigh decent ones. As the title states, Nuns aren't spoken of much yet quite a few of them are neck-deep in sexual scandals!

NUNSEXUAL PREDATORSEXRELIGION

Illya B.

1/28/20257 min read

So much crisscrossing sexual crime surrounding the two most popular religions makes one wonder if THIS IS the reason why so many join and hold on tight to that veil of secrecy. Hmph. With all that we know of the sexual misconduct taking place in Islamic and Catholic religions, why the fuck hasn't there been any hard punishments been administered? Snake Island is just sitting there. Js.

According to a 2019 nbcnews.com, article, almost 1700 of those accused are out and about rubbing elbows with the populace, as though nothing happened, living their lives, some of which involve being around children again. What. The. Fuck. The prevalent issue of sexual misconduct within prominent religious institutions, particularly in the Catholic and Islamic communities, has left us all concerned about accountability, transparency, and justice. What the hell happened? Many articles illustrate a disturbing pattern of abuse that transcends geographic and cultural boundaries, underscoring a systemic failure to address these heinous acts adequately. But why though?

Firstly, the veil of secrecy surrounding these institutions can be attributed to several factors. Both the Catholic Church and various Islamic organizations historically prioritize the preservation of their reputation over the welfare of victims. This often results in cover-ups, where allegations are dismissed or inadequately addressed, creating an environment where perpetrators operate with impunity. The psychological and social power dynamics at play further complicate reporting mechanisms, as victims may fear retribution, ostracism, or disbelief— just because of who the perpetrators are.

Secondly, the lack of hard punishments for offenders within these communities raises critical questions about the effectiveness of existing oversight mechanisms and the legal frameworks designed to protect individuals from abuse. In many cases, ecclesiastical courts handle allegations internally, prioritizing the institution's image rather than ensuring justice for victims. Where is the Supreme Court in all of this? This current approach not only fails to deter future misconduct but also perpetuates a cycle of abuse, where offenders are frequently allowed to continue their roles without facing substantial consequences.

Moreover, the ramifications of such failures extend beyond the immediate victims to the broader community, fostering distrust and disillusionment among followers. Many individuals question the moral authority of religious leaders who have been complicit or passive in the face of such atrocities, leading to a decline in faith and participation within these communities.

Again, why the hell hasn't the Supreme Court stepped in?!

The victims and/or their guardians have accepted settlement after settlement putting a price on their silence and not saying much afterwards. This filth will never end as it seemingly prevails over the course of years in most cases, only to be bought off with hush money. Why even complain about it, right? Appears to be a lucrative form of income for these victims. The whole situation is weird to say the least.

If you step outside of your anger for a moment, you'll soon realize, as you take notice of all the innuendos. Sex is almost everywhere you look. For instance, artists encouraged and popularized brazen and wanton sex in a lot of literature, music, artworks, and architecture all throughout history. And when you start to look for it you'll be called a conspiracy theorist because it is THAT MUCH IN YOUR FACE. Imagine the subliminal material that accompanies these teachings at private religious institutions. And while we know not all are guilty, we also know that: many are. That's like saying all cops are bad when we know they all aren't. It's with certainty that there are many "good" one's left; but as history often shows us, the bad guys usually do outnumber the good ones.

However, imposing such a demonic setting picturing them as offenders alongside pedos, there are, in fact, surprisingly enough, many covenants are low-key brothels. Plus, it is believed that though their vows restrict clergy from any kind of sexual conduct, they in turn, internalize their escapades within their monasteries and covenants.

While discussions around accountability are gaining momentum, significant barriers remain. Societal norms, fear of stigma, and entrenched institutional policies make it challenging for victims to seek justice. Advocates, policymakers, and community leaders must push for reform, ensure transparency, and create safe environments for victims to come forward without fear of reprisal. Now if we can only get someone to NOT take the money!
[[In the meantime, YOU can report clergy misconduct here, anonymously]]

Humanity has to recognize that the call for stringent punishment and reform is not merely an emotional response but a necessary step towards restoring integrity and accountability within these religious communities. Only through unwavering commitment to justice can we hope to dismantle the veneer of secrecy that has allowed such egregious acts to persist unchallenged.

sinister looking nun with crazy eyes
sinister looking nun with crazy eyes

Yup, we're going to address the next lie people cling to because it feels safer: the whole idea that women in religious orders are somehow exempt from the same corrupting forces. They’re not. And pretending they are has protected abusers. Yea, I said it. Nuns have long been marketed as passive, selfless, spiritually elevated beings. Cloistered. Devout. Sexless. Harmless. The problem is that none of those traits are biologically, neurologically, or psychologically sustainable in actual human beings. That myth didn’t make nuns holy — it made them unaccountable.

Let’s deal with the elephant in the convent: the demand that women suppress agency, sexuality, ambition, anger, and autonomy while being handed authority over children is not spiritual discipline. It is a pressure cooker. No human brain can operate in a state of perpetual single-minded devotion. Neuroscience has settled that. Consciousness wanders. The mind self-stimulates. Emotion seeks expression. When all healthy outlets are forbidden, the pressure does not vanish — it redirects.

Historically, that redirection showed up in Catholic schools first.

The ruler jokes weren’t jokes. They were confessions nobody took seriously. Corporal punishment, humiliation, intimidation, and psychological cruelty were normalized because they wore a habit and claimed divine mandate. Violence was reframed as correction. Rage was baptized as righteousness. Children learned early that suffering could be called love if God’s name was attached to it. This behavior isn’t random, either. It's patterned into the catholic narrative. And patterns don’t come from individual moral failure alone — they come from systems that reward obedience, suppress dissent, and excuse authority. Once you understand that, the next step stops being shocking and starts being inevitable.

Yes, there have been documented cases of sexual abuse by nuns. Not folklore. That's not an internet rumor. Real victims. Real institutions. Real settlements. Real silencing. These cases didn’t explode publicly the way priest scandals did for one simple reason: society refuses to imagine women as perpetrators when they’re wrapped in religious symbolism. The same denial that delayed justice for priest victims also erased the victims of women. That erasure is not innocence. It is protection. And it worked. The Church didn’t need to move nuns across dioceses the same way it moved priests. All it had to do was lean on the same mechanisms already exposed: internal discipline, quiet transfers, silence framed as virtue, and the ever-present option of hush money when things got loud. The same institutional reflex. Different uniform. And kids, teens and subordinates alike pay the price for these lies.

This is where people get uncomfortable, because it breaks a comforting narrative. It’s easier to believe abuse is a male problem than to confront the truth: abuse is a power problem. Give any human unchecked authority, insulation from consequence, and theological justification, and you will get harm. Gender doesn’t cancel that equation.

And no — this is not an attack on all nuns. That lazy defense misses the point on purpose. Miss me with that garbage. This is an indictment of a system that placed its women into roles that required them to be inhuman, then punished everyone beneath them when reality leaked through. And the Church continues to demand that women of the cloth live as symbols instead of people. Symbols don’t get therapy nor do they get accountability. Symbols don’t get questioned. And symbols don’t get reported to police. Kids, teens and subordinatees alike paid the price for that lie.

If the first article asked why institutions protect predators, this one answers the follow-up question people avoid: why were we trained not to look too closely at women in habits? Why did discipline get a pass? Why did cruelty get romanticized? Why did victims doubt themselves when their abuser didn’t fit the stereotype? Because the institution needed a moral firewall. And it found one in gendered mythology.

Until people are willing to accept that abuse thrives wherever power is insulated — regardless of sex, robe, or religion — nothing changes. Settlements continue. Silence gets rewarded. Survivors get medicated and labeled bitter. And these institutions keep preaching morality. All the while the nun is conditioned—trained by fear and convenience to never challenge power, never disrupt comfort, never risk exposure. Complicit because she benefits from looking away, complacent because effort might cost her cover. She tells herself that her inaction is neutrality, and that her own deplorable acts are justified. These lies are her daily bread.

What makes her even more vile isn’t just the secrets she carries—it’s the way she leans on collective denial in order to keep carrying it. She hides in plain sight by being unremarkable and shrouded in layers of fabricated religion. The veil doesn’t just hide sin. It hides accountability. And it looks like that will continue to be prevalent within the Catholic sect until a sweeping kulling/purge raptures the entirety of ALL religions. But that will never happen. Too much money and control is at stake. . .